Sep
30

In a major win for the public interest, the Broadband Data Improvement Act passed the Senate (on September 26th) and the House (on September 29th). Due to amendments, it now goes back to the Senate for final approval (should be pro-forma) before it lands on George Bush's desk.
With the United States falling further and further behind a host of other countries, the question on many people's minds (including the folks over at Point-Topic who created this graphic) is, "Why is this happening?":

[Yes, that's the United States, chugging along ever closer to the bottom of the pack. Click here for a full-size image.]
Senator Inouye and Congressman Markey have been pushing for the passage of this bill for quite some time -- resurrecting the idea from congress to congress. The Act, with its explicit purpose "To improve the quality of Federal and State data regarding the availability and quality of broadband services and to promote the deployment of affordable broadband services to all parts of the Nation." has drawn widespread opposition from telcos who've claimed that our current data collection efforts are "good enough." Full text of the Act can be found here.
Among it's mandates, the Broadband Data Improvement Act requires that:
- Demographic Information for Unserved Areas- As part of the inquiry required by subsection (b), the Commission shall compile a list of geographical areas that are not served by any provider of advanced telecommunications capability (as defined by section 706(c)(1) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. 157nt note)) and to the extent that data from the Census Bureau is available, determine, for each such unserved area
-
(1) the population;
(2) the population density; and
(3) the average per capita income.
For those of us studying the digital divide, these data will provide much-needed information about the nature of underserved communities. Of course, they could also paint a damning picture of systematic, institutionalized redlining of poor and rural constituencies.
The Act also calls for an in-depth international comparison of broadband service levels, speeds, and pricing. 75 communities in 25 countries, matched "to the extent possible [by] population size, population density, topography, and demographic profile...comparable to the population size, population density, topography, and demographic profile of various communities within the United States" will be assessed.
Even more importantly, the Act requires a "Consumer Survey of Broadband Service Capability" -- in other words, it requires collection of real-world information on what's happening with broadband services in the United states. According to the Act:
- For the purpose of evaluating, on a statistically significant basis, the national characteristics of the use of broadband service capability, the Commission shall conduct and make public periodic surveys of consumers in urban, suburban, and rural areas in the large business, small business, and residential consumer markets to determine
-
(A) the types of technology used to provide the broadband service capability to which consumers subscribe;
(B) the amounts consumers pay per month for such capability;
(C) the actual data transmission speeds of such capability;
(D) the types of applications and services consumers most frequently use in conjunction with such capability;
(E) for consumers who have declined to subscribe to broadband service capability, the reasons given by such consumers for declining such capability;
(F) other sources of broadband service capability which consumers regularly use or on which they rely; and
(G) any other information the Commission deems appropriate for such purpose.
Along with requirements to investigate how best to collect a host of different metrics and a mandate for states to likewise engage in broadband data collection efforts, the Broadband Data Improvement Act represents an important step forward in addressing the broadband market failure gripping the United States. Though the Act's loopholes may yet allow for further obfuscation of critically important data, overall, this Act adds a great deal of momentum to efforts to increase digital inclusion and foster universal, affordable broadband access.

This is directly related to new state laws regarding cable franchise. Most don't require build-out to new development. If the average community grows at a rate of 2% per year, then you can bet that the USA will fall to the bottom of the graph.
I wouldn't be so quick to suggest that the telecom industry was opposed to the bill that passed.
See link below: http://connectednation.com/the_blog/2008/09/with-eye-to-americas-future-economic.php
Wow and I thought Australia was really lagging behind!



Wow that was beyond my expectation. I've never expect this before. The diagram shows very clear.
I can only hope that the Senate understands the US's need for better broadband before we fall too far behind.
If barack obama gets his way... we might as well start changing the prices on the back of our books to match Canada's pricing on national healthcare in a socialist economy. The banks will be run by the government and all hell just might break loose.
I love what you guys are always up too. Such clever work and reporting! Keep up the great works guys I've added you guys to my blogroll
The diagram shock me. I still don't understand why Australia more better than USA?
Well this is quite surprising for me usually i dont follow such diagrams but its realy shocking.
Estonia and Belgium at the top. I am surprised , very surprised. Well, as they say: Live and learn...
I just found this chart on google. It's a bummer to see that, as you say, the US is at the bottom just "chugging along". :(
Is there an updated chart on where we are now, and do you think the recent decision on "net neutrality" will have any effect on future growth (or lack there of).
I LOVE THE INTERNET, AND ACCESSING IT VIA BROADBAND! I remember dial up. :(
George
The bill has been gutted to be useless. Way to screw over Americans. Broadband in this country is a monopoly by market, far from offering choices to consumers we are forced to pay high prices for sub par services.
Fundamental change is needed and without proper measurement of broadband there really isn't much hope for actual change and competition between types of providers.
Congress you disgust me.
According to NTIA Administrator Lawrence E. Strickling, "better data and strategic planning are needed on the state level. This will help us increase broadband availability and use across the country, which is critical to our global competiveness."
Post new comment