Aug
4

I got a surprise call from Gigi Sohn, President of Public Knowledge, yesterday evening that I'd been chosen by this year's judges for their IP3 award for "Internet Protocol". Very exciting stuff! You can swing by and hoist a pint in celebration at the October 15th award ceremony. More info is below:
Public Knowledge Presents Sixth IP3 Awards to Vaidhyanathan, Jackson, Meinrath
For Immediate Release:
August 4, 2009
Public Knowledge President Gigi B. Sohn announced that three winners have been chosen for the 2009 IP3 awards. In addition, a special President’s Award will also be presented. The name of that winner has not yet been disclosed.
This year, the awards will be given to Siva Vaidhyanathan, Karen Jackson and Sascha Meinrath. Awards are given to individuals who over the past year (or over the course of their careers) who have advanced the public interest in one of the three areas of “IP” –Intellectual Property, Information Policy and Internet Protocol. The awards will be presented at a ceremony Oct. 15 in Washington, D.C.
Vaidhyanathan was recognized for his work in intellectual property. Now a professor of media studies at the University of Virginia, Vaidhyanathan for a decade has been one of the leading academic advocates for a more balanced copyright policy. He is the author of two books, His first book, “Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How it Threatens Creativity,” (New York University Press, 2001) and “The Anarchist in the Library: How the Clash Between Freedom and Control is Hacking the Real World and Crashing the System” (Basic Books, 2004), with a third scheduled for next year. He also has written numerous articles and appeared on TV making the case for access to information.
Jackson, the deputy secretary of technology for the Commonwealth of Virginia, was recognized for her work in information policy. She was recognized for her work in making information available to local governments about how to bring broadband to their areas, and for leading the Commonwealth’s broadband mapping project using state resources to complete the task ahead of many other states. She has worked with government and industry to become one of the preeminent broadband advocates in the country.
Meinrath was recognized for his work in Internet protocol. He is the creator of the Open Technology Initiative (OTI) at the New America Foundation. OTI is dedicated to using the potential of innovative open technologies by studying their social and economic impact, providing in-depth, objective research, analysis, and findings. He was also a principal in creating the Measurement Lab (M-Lab), an open platform designed to allow researchers to study traffic on the Internet. He also has a long history of building wireless community networks, and provides expertise on spectrum issues to the Public Interest Spectrum Coalition.
Judges for this year were:
Kenneth DeGraff, legislative director for Rep. Mike Doyle;
Parul Desai, vice president of the Media Access Project;
Jason Schultz, Acting Director, Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic, UC Berkeley School of Law;
Jonathan Taplin, professor at the Annenberg School of Communications at the University of Southern California, and a member of the Public Knowledge Board of Directors.
IP3 winners in 2008 were Ben Scott, policy director at Free Press; Fred von Lohmann, senior staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Carl Malamud, founder of Public.Resource.org. Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) received the special President’s Award.
Public Knowledge is a public-interest advocacy and education organization that seeks to promote a balanced approach to intellectual property law and technology policy that reflects the “cultural bargain” intended by the framers of the constitution. More information available at: http://www.publicknowledge.org

Congratulations Sascha. Well-deserved.
Might as well call these the "Google Awards," because they seem to have been granted for conformance to Google's corporate agendas: minimizing copyright protection, encouraging government competition with private ISPs, and regulating the Internet in ways that favor Google. And I'm not surprised that Sascha won, since -- being employed by the New Ameria Foundation -- he is, essentially, an employee of Google.
Congrats Sascha! I'll have a pint of [Canadian] beer in your honor as soon as I'm back in the New World.
... because we all know how incredibly relevant copyright laws from the 1886 Berne convention are to today's issues.
... because large ISPs should continue to be able to discriminate against their customers and competitors when they're not fulfilling their connectivity requirements and engage in opaque traffic shaping and data manipulation without the knowledge or consent of their paying customers.
Copyright has come a long way since the 1800s. And while not every change to the law has been an improvement, it has been tremendously successful at encouraging creativity and innovation. Recent threats to copyright protection have correlated with our country's diminished stature in the world. Perhaps you do not like copyright because you simply want everything for free?
As for ISPs: you apparently have an irrational belief that all ISPs are evil (perhaps, again, because you expect them to give you their services for free). Or maybe you're part of Google's agenda to harm them?
Google, of course, would like to run roughshod over both. It makes its money by copying copyrighted material without permission, and has become increasingly emboldened over time -- trying to cross the line between "fair use" and exploitation of authors' work without compensation. And, of course, it wants all of the things it copies to be distributed for free -- which is why it is making the false claims that you parrot above in an attempt to undermine ISPs. How dare those pesky ISPs ask for money for the hard work they do to build, maintain, and support networks!
Google is spending billions on lobbying in DC, much of it through astroturf groups such as The New America Foundation (which it owns and controls), Free Press, and Public Knowledge. The "awards" mentioned above are merely mutual back-patting among Google's paid lobbyists. See
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/08/07/circular_awards/
Post new comment