<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>saschameinrath.com</title>
  <subtitle>public ponderings...</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.saschameinrath.com"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.saschameinrath.com/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.saschameinrath.com/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-03-27T11:25:31-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>The Philadelphia Story Continues...  A.K.A. Lose Lips and Something About Ships.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/may/07/philadelphia_story_continues_k_lose_lips_and_something_about_ships" />
    <id>http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/may/07/philadelphia_story_continues_k_lose_lips_and_something_about_ships</id>
    <published>2008-05-07T15:29:22-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-05-07T21:55:55-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sascha</name>
    </author>
    <category term="EarthLink" />
    <category term="municipal wireless" />
    <category term="NAF" />
    <category term="OneCommunity" />
    <category term="philadelphia" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The Philadelphia saga is about to get a whole lot more interesting.  Though I've been privy to a lot of the behind-the-scene negotiations, if you're looking for details, you'll have to look elsewhere.  However, you won't have to wait long -- <a href="http://philly.metro.us/metro/local/article/Citywide_WiFi_could_be_shut_down/12422.html" target="blank">the Philadelphia Metro has already started covering things</a> -- which means that someone's already spilling the beans.  Meanwhile, the Philadelphia Inquirer and the Daily News are going to be running stories tomorrow.</p>
<p>All in all, the proposed solution is a really good one for the residents of Philly; but yes, it's caught up on the demand for a $250,000 payment.  Meanwhile, Wireless Philadelphia released this statement today...</p>
<ul>
Dear Friend of Wireless Philadelphia:</p>
<p>I am writing to provide you a brief update on the Wireless<br />
Philadelphia Initiative.</p>
<p>Philadelphia's Wi-Fi network continues to operate in the roughly 80% of the City in which it has been deployed (see map <http://www.noozeletter.com/noozeletters/wirelessphiladelphia/lists/lt.php?id=MkkEWVIIBwpIDgseDA9QVw%3D%3D>). Nothing in the ten-year Network Agreement<br />
<http://www.noozeletter.com/noozeletters/wirelessphiladelphia/lists/lt.php?id=MkkEWVIIBwtIDgseDA9QVw%3D%3D><br />
permits EarthLink to unilaterally impose deadlines for the network's transfer, turn off the network or remove network equipment.</p>
<p>It has been well publicized that EarthLink recently announced its intention to sell its Wi-Fi networks and exit the municipal wireless business. Wireless Philadelphia and the City of Philadelphia continue to work together to explore options for the network's future. In the meantime, we are committed to our core mission of serving Digital Inclusion customers with internet access, hardware, technical support and training.</p>
<p>Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have.</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Greg Goldman<br />
CEO<br />
Wireless Philadelphia<br />
ggoldman@wirelessphiladelphia.org
</ul>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The Philadelphia saga is about to get a whole lot more interesting.  Though I've been privy to a lot of the behind-the-scene negotiations, if you're looking for details, you'll have to look elsewhere.  However, you won't have to wait long -- <a href="http://philly.metro.us/metro/local/article/Citywide_WiFi_could_be_shut_down/12422.html" target="blank">the Philadelphia Metro has already started covering things</a> -- which means that someone's already spilling the beans.  Meanwhile, the Philadelphia Inquirer and the Daily News are going to be running stories tomorrow.</p>
<p>All in all, the proposed solution is a really good one for the residents of Philly; but yes, it's caught up on the demand for a $250,000 payment.  Meanwhile, Wireless Philadelphia released this statement today...</p>
<ul>
Dear Friend of Wireless Philadelphia:</p>
<p>I am writing to provide you a brief update on the Wireless<br />
Philadelphia Initiative.</p>
<p>Philadelphia's Wi-Fi network continues to operate in the roughly 80% of the City in which it has been deployed (see map <http://www.noozeletter.com/noozeletters/wirelessphiladelphia/lists/lt.php?id=MkkEWVIIBwpIDgseDA9QVw%3D%3D>). Nothing in the ten-year Network Agreement<br />
<http://www.noozeletter.com/noozeletters/wirelessphiladelphia/lists/lt.php?id=MkkEWVIIBwtIDgseDA9QVw%3D%3D><br />
permits EarthLink to unilaterally impose deadlines for the network's transfer, turn off the network or remove network equipment.</p>
<p>It has been well publicized that EarthLink recently announced its intention to sell its Wi-Fi networks and exit the municipal wireless business. Wireless Philadelphia and the City of Philadelphia continue to work together to explore options for the network's future. In the meantime, we are committed to our core mission of serving Digital Inclusion customers with internet access, hardware, technical support and training.</p>
<p>Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have.</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Greg Goldman<br />
CEO<br />
Wireless Philadelphia<br />
ggoldman@wirelessphiladelphia.org
</ul>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Fun with OLSR.  A.K.A., More Iphone Hacking.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/may/06/fun_olsr_k_more_iphone_hacking" />
    <id>http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/may/06/fun_olsr_k_more_iphone_hacking</id>
    <published>2008-05-06T12:55:03-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-05-06T12:55:03-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sascha</name>
    </author>
    <category term="device as infrastructure" />
    <category term="iphone" />
    <category term="NAF" />
    <category term="olsr" />
    <category term="oswc" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>My friend and colleague, Aaron Kaplan, has been playing around with his Iphone and is now running open source mesh software on it.  The eventual goal of all of this is to create device-as-infrastructure networks -- i.e., systems where every piece of hardware is also a part of the communications network.  As we've continued to work on integrating myriad open source wireless technologies into a single solution, <a href="http://www.olsr.org/?q=node/24" target="blank">experiments to integrate Iphones and other devices into new network architectures continue to provide fascinating results</a>.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>My friend and colleague, Aaron Kaplan, has been playing around with his Iphone and is now running open source mesh software on it.  The eventual goal of all of this is to create device-as-infrastructure networks -- i.e., systems where every piece of hardware is also a part of the communications network.  As we've continued to work on integrating myriad open source wireless technologies into a single solution, <a href="http://www.olsr.org/?q=node/24" target="blank">experiments to integrate Iphones and other devices into new network architectures continue to provide fascinating results</a>.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>IPv4 -- Less than 1000 Days Left Until Number Exhaustion!?!?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/may/03/ipv4_less_1000_days_left_until_number_exhaustion" />
    <id>http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/may/03/ipv4_less_1000_days_left_until_number_exhaustion</id>
    <published>2008-05-03T19:16:35-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-05-03T19:17:23-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sascha</name>
    </author>
    <category term="arin" />
    <category term="ipv4" />
    <category term="ipv6" />
    <category term="NAF" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Mike Leber over at Hurricane Electric put out a reminder that some <a href="http://entne.jp/tool/toollist/000101.php" target="blank">estimates are now putting IPv4 number exhaustion at less than 1000 days out</a>.</p>
<script type=“text/javascript” language=“javascript” src=“http://entne.jp/labs/blogparts/wolf3/en-us/wolf_c.js”></script><p>
Having raised this issue with folks here in DC quite a bit, I've been intrigued by the lack of regard with which this problem has been met.  In fact, it seems like few folks want to really address the issue, even though it's a problem that's certain to only grow in complexity and dysfunction as we near exhaustion.  </p>
<p>Having just attended the most recent ARIN meeting in Denver, CO, I know that the scientific, research, and general IP communities have been ringing the klaxon for awhile now.  <a href="http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4" target="blank">Impressive amounts of information on the impending IPv4 exhaustion are readily available</a>, and there's even some of us inside the beltway who are available resources to talk with anyone who'd be interested in addressing the problem (so do give a call).</p>
<p>What's worse, IPv6, while the only solution available, has its own scalability problems.  </p>
<p>All I'm saying is, when this becomes "the big story" -- remember, lots of us have been working to proactively address the problem for years.  We certainly can't say we didn't see this coming.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Mike Leber over at Hurricane Electric put out a reminder that some <a href="http://entne.jp/tool/toollist/000101.php" target="blank">estimates are now putting IPv4 number exhaustion at less than 1000 days out</a>.</p>
<script type=“text/javascript” language=“javascript” src=“http://entne.jp/labs/blogparts/wolf3/en-us/wolf_c.js”></script><p>
Having raised this issue with folks here in DC quite a bit, I've been intrigued by the lack of regard with which this problem has been met.  In fact, it seems like few folks want to really address the issue, even though it's a problem that's certain to only grow in complexity and dysfunction as we near exhaustion.  </p>
<p>Having just attended the most recent ARIN meeting in Denver, CO, I know that the scientific, research, and general IP communities have been ringing the klaxon for awhile now.  <a href="http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4" target="blank">Impressive amounts of information on the impending IPv4 exhaustion are readily available</a>, and there's even some of us inside the beltway who are available resources to talk with anyone who'd be interested in addressing the problem (so do give a call).</p>
<p>What's worse, IPv6, while the only solution available, has its own scalability problems.  </p>
<p>All I'm saying is, when this becomes "the big story" -- remember, lots of us have been working to proactively address the problem for years.  We certainly can't say we didn't see this coming.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Computers, Freedom, &amp; Privacy 2008 Conference</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/may/01/computers_freedom_privacy_2008_conference" />
    <id>http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/may/01/computers_freedom_privacy_2008_conference</id>
    <published>2008-05-01T11:22:14-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-05-01T11:22:53-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sascha</name>
    </author>
    <category term="cfp" />
    <category term="conference" />
    <category term="NAF" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I've been on the coordinating committee for the upcoming Computers, Freedom, &amp; Privacy Conference which is taking place up in New Haven, CT later this month.  The schedule is now just about finalized and it has shaped up to be an amazing group of intellectuals and experts.  </p>
<p>Here's more information for anyone who's interested in these issues:</p>
<ul>
<p>COMPUTERS, FREEDOM, AND PRIVACY: TECHNOLOGY POLICY '08<br />
http://cfp2008.org/<br />
18th Annual CFP conference<br />
May 20-23, 2008<br />
Omni Hotel<br />
New Haven, CT</p>
<p>Conference Blog: http://cfp08.blogspot.com/<br />
Facebook Group: http://www.facebook.com/groups.php?id=683858084<br />
Conference Wiki: http://cfp.wikia.com/wiki/CFP08<br />
LinkedIn Group: http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/61857/7885844E0F9D</p>
<p>Hotel Conference Discount Deadline: May 1, 2008<br />
Early Bird Registration: Fri., May 2, 2008<br />
YJoLT Tech Policy Essay Contest: Mon., May 5, 2008</p>
<p>ABOUT CFP: TECHNOLOGY POLICY `08</p>
<p>What should the technology policy priorities of the next administration be? </p>
<p>As the choice of presidential candidates becomes clearer and election year moves towards a comparison of the candidates' platforms on the issues, technology policy is increasingly relevant to the forefront of public debate. In the areas of privacy, intellectual property, cybersecurity, telecommunications, and freedom of speech, topics that were once confined to experts now appear in the mainstream of political issues. We now know that our decisions about technology policy are being made at a time as the architectures of our information and communication technologies are still being built.</p>
<p>This year, the 18th annual Computers, Freedom, and Privacy conference is focusing on those issues at the forefront of technology policy this election year. With plenary panels on the "National Security State and the Next Administration" and "The 21st Century Panopticon?" the discussions taking place look towards our present and future priorities.</p>
<p>CFP: Technology Policy '08 is an opportunity to participate in shaping those issues being made into laws and regulations and those technological infrastructures being developed. Policies ranging from spyware and national security, to ISP filtering and patent reform, e-voting to electronic medical records, and more will be addressed by expert panels of technologists, policymakers, business leaders, and activists. The panel topics are listed below and full panel descriptions are available on the conference website at:</p>
<p>  http://www.cfp2008.org/wiki/index.php/Program.</p>
<p>The CFP: Technology Policy `08 conversation has already begun in the virtual spaces connected to the conference. Even if you are unable to attend the conference this year, there are several opportunities to participate remotely. The guiding principles that ought to guide our policies are being debated on the conference blog. Social networking groups on Facebook and LinkedIn are providing new spaces for the CFP community to meet and discuss. The Yale Journal of Law and Technology is hosting a call for essays, on the priorities of the next administration, with more details below.</p>
<p>We look forward to seeing you in New Haven on May 20-23.</p>
<p>CONFERENCE PROGRAM</p>
<p>Plenary Sessions<br />
Presidential Technology Policy: Priorities for the Next Executive<br />
The 21st Century Panopticon?<br />
The National Security State and the Next Adminstration</p>
<p>Tutorials<br />
A Short History of Privacy<br />
Constitutional Law in Cyberspace<br />
e-Deceptive Campaign Practices: Elections 2.0<br />
Maintaining Privacy While Accessing On-line Information</p>
<p>Panel Sessions<br />
Activism and Education Using Social Networks<br />
Breaking the Silence: Iranians Find a Voice on the Internet<br />
Charismatic Content: Wikis, Social Networks, and the Future of<br />
User-Generated Content<br />
Filtering Out Copyright Infringement: Possibilities, Practicalities, and<br />
Legalities<br />
Filtering and Censorship in Europe<br />
Hate Speech and Oppression in Cyberspace<br />
Interoperability at the Crossroads?: The "Liberal Order" versus<br />
Fragmentation<br />
Law, Regulation, and Software Licensing for the Electronic Medical Record<br />
Measuring Global Threats to Internet Freedom<br />
Network Neutrality: Beyond the Slogans<br />
New Challenges for Spyware Policy<br />
Patents: The Bleeding Edge of Technology Policy<br />
Privacy, Reputation, and the Management of Online Communities<br />
Rights &amp; Responsibilities for Software Programs?<br />
States as Incubators of Change<br />
"The Transparent Society:" Ten Years Later<br />
Towards Trustworthy e-Voting: An Open Source Approach?</p>
<p>CALL FOR ESSAYS</p>
<p>Yale Journal of Law &amp; Technology Call for Essays on the Technology Policy of the New Administration.<br />
Deadline: Monday, May 5th</p>
<p>The Yale Journal of Law &amp; Technology (YJoLT) is seeking essay-length submissions concerning the technology policy platform of the new American presidential administration.  Essays selected for publication will appear in the Fall Issue of YJoLT (publication date November 2008).  </p>
<p>Ideal submissions will discuss the priorities and guiding principles that American technology policy should follow.  Submissions analyzing a particular technology policy issue in depth will also be accepted.     </p>
<p>Essays of less than 5,000 words are preferred.  Please submit all essays to yjolt.submissions@gmail.com.  Please include the text "CFP Essay" in the subject line of the email.  The authors of essays selected for publication will be notified on a rolling basis.  Any questions can be directed to Lara Rogers, lara.rogers@yale.edu.</p>
<p>CONFERENCE FUNDING FOR JOURNALISTS</p>
<p>The Yale Law School Law and Media Program (LAMP) announces an opportunity for journalists to receive full funding to attend CFP: Technology Policy  08.</p>
<p>CFP: Technology Policy  08 will begin with a full day of tutorials and programming specifically geared toward journalists writing about information technology and policy, followed by a networking reception for journalists and other participants in the Law and Media Program.</p>
<p>We invite you to take advantage of this opportunity to develop a deeper understanding of US technology policy in the information age.</p>
<p>Journalists writing on privacy, intellectual property, telecommunications and cyberlaw are encouraged to apply for conference funding, which will include travel, hotel, meals and any registration fees for the full conference.</p>
<p>To apply, please send a cover letter explaining your interest in the program, along with your resume and three writing samples (by e-mail and hard copy) to Tracey Parr (tracey.parr@yale.edu), Yale Law School, P.O. Box 208215, New Haven, CT 06520-8215, by March 31, 2008. Up to twenty journalists will receive conference funding. Applicants accepted for conference funding will be notified by April 4, 2008.
</ul>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I've been on the coordinating committee for the upcoming Computers, Freedom, &amp; Privacy Conference which is taking place up in New Haven, CT later this month.  The schedule is now just about finalized and it has shaped up to be an amazing group of intellectuals and experts.  </p>
<p>Here's more information for anyone who's interested in these issues:</p>
<ul>
<p>COMPUTERS, FREEDOM, AND PRIVACY: TECHNOLOGY POLICY '08<br />
http://cfp2008.org/<br />
18th Annual CFP conference<br />
May 20-23, 2008<br />
Omni Hotel<br />
New Haven, CT</p>
<p>Conference Blog: http://cfp08.blogspot.com/<br />
Facebook Group: http://www.facebook.com/groups.php?id=683858084<br />
Conference Wiki: http://cfp.wikia.com/wiki/CFP08<br />
LinkedIn Group: http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/61857/7885844E0F9D</p>
<p>Hotel Conference Discount Deadline: May 1, 2008<br />
Early Bird Registration: Fri., May 2, 2008<br />
YJoLT Tech Policy Essay Contest: Mon., May 5, 2008</p>
<p>ABOUT CFP: TECHNOLOGY POLICY `08</p>
<p>What should the technology policy priorities of the next administration be? </p>
<p>As the choice of presidential candidates becomes clearer and election year moves towards a comparison of the candidates' platforms on the issues, technology policy is increasingly relevant to the forefront of public debate. In the areas of privacy, intellectual property, cybersecurity, telecommunications, and freedom of speech, topics that were once confined to experts now appear in the mainstream of political issues. We now know that our decisions about technology policy are being made at a time as the architectures of our information and communication technologies are still being built.</p>
<p>This year, the 18th annual Computers, Freedom, and Privacy conference is focusing on those issues at the forefront of technology policy this election year. With plenary panels on the "National Security State and the Next Administration" and "The 21st Century Panopticon?" the discussions taking place look towards our present and future priorities.</p>
<p>CFP: Technology Policy '08 is an opportunity to participate in shaping those issues being made into laws and regulations and those technological infrastructures being developed. Policies ranging from spyware and national security, to ISP filtering and patent reform, e-voting to electronic medical records, and more will be addressed by expert panels of technologists, policymakers, business leaders, and activists. The panel topics are listed below and full panel descriptions are available on the conference website at:</p>
<p>  http://www.cfp2008.org/wiki/index.php/Program.</p>
<p>The CFP: Technology Policy `08 conversation has already begun in the virtual spaces connected to the conference. Even if you are unable to attend the conference this year, there are several opportunities to participate remotely. The guiding principles that ought to guide our policies are being debated on the conference blog. Social networking groups on Facebook and LinkedIn are providing new spaces for the CFP community to meet and discuss. The Yale Journal of Law and Technology is hosting a call for essays, on the priorities of the next administration, with more details below.</p>
<p>We look forward to seeing you in New Haven on May 20-23.</p>
<p>CONFERENCE PROGRAM</p>
<p>Plenary Sessions<br />
Presidential Technology Policy: Priorities for the Next Executive<br />
The 21st Century Panopticon?<br />
The National Security State and the Next Adminstration</p>
<p>Tutorials<br />
A Short History of Privacy<br />
Constitutional Law in Cyberspace<br />
e-Deceptive Campaign Practices: Elections 2.0<br />
Maintaining Privacy While Accessing On-line Information</p>
<p>Panel Sessions<br />
Activism and Education Using Social Networks<br />
Breaking the Silence: Iranians Find a Voice on the Internet<br />
Charismatic Content: Wikis, Social Networks, and the Future of<br />
User-Generated Content<br />
Filtering Out Copyright Infringement: Possibilities, Practicalities, and<br />
Legalities<br />
Filtering and Censorship in Europe<br />
Hate Speech and Oppression in Cyberspace<br />
Interoperability at the Crossroads?: The "Liberal Order" versus<br />
Fragmentation<br />
Law, Regulation, and Software Licensing for the Electronic Medical Record<br />
Measuring Global Threats to Internet Freedom<br />
Network Neutrality: Beyond the Slogans<br />
New Challenges for Spyware Policy<br />
Patents: The Bleeding Edge of Technology Policy<br />
Privacy, Reputation, and the Management of Online Communities<br />
Rights &amp; Responsibilities for Software Programs?<br />
States as Incubators of Change<br />
"The Transparent Society:" Ten Years Later<br />
Towards Trustworthy e-Voting: An Open Source Approach?</p>
<p>CALL FOR ESSAYS</p>
<p>Yale Journal of Law &amp; Technology Call for Essays on the Technology Policy of the New Administration.<br />
Deadline: Monday, May 5th</p>
<p>The Yale Journal of Law &amp; Technology (YJoLT) is seeking essay-length submissions concerning the technology policy platform of the new American presidential administration.  Essays selected for publication will appear in the Fall Issue of YJoLT (publication date November 2008).  </p>
<p>Ideal submissions will discuss the priorities and guiding principles that American technology policy should follow.  Submissions analyzing a particular technology policy issue in depth will also be accepted.     </p>
<p>Essays of less than 5,000 words are preferred.  Please submit all essays to yjolt.submissions@gmail.com.  Please include the text "CFP Essay" in the subject line of the email.  The authors of essays selected for publication will be notified on a rolling basis.  Any questions can be directed to Lara Rogers, lara.rogers@yale.edu.</p>
<p>CONFERENCE FUNDING FOR JOURNALISTS</p>
<p>The Yale Law School Law and Media Program (LAMP) announces an opportunity for journalists to receive full funding to attend CFP: Technology Policy  08.</p>
<p>CFP: Technology Policy  08 will begin with a full day of tutorials and programming specifically geared toward journalists writing about information technology and policy, followed by a networking reception for journalists and other participants in the Law and Media Program.</p>
<p>We invite you to take advantage of this opportunity to develop a deeper understanding of US technology policy in the information age.</p>
<p>Journalists writing on privacy, intellectual property, telecommunications and cyberlaw are encouraged to apply for conference funding, which will include travel, hotel, meals and any registration fees for the full conference.</p>
<p>To apply, please send a cover letter explaining your interest in the program, along with your resume and three writing samples (by e-mail and hard copy) to Tracey Parr (tracey.parr@yale.edu), Yale Law School, P.O. Box 208215, New Haven, CT 06520-8215, by March 31, 2008. Up to twenty journalists will receive conference funding. Applicants accepted for conference funding will be notified by April 4, 2008.
</ul>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Basque Rides Again!  </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/apr/16/basque_rides_again" />
    <id>http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/apr/16/basque_rides_again</id>
    <published>2008-04-16T12:55:42-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-04-16T13:09:20-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sascha</name>
    </author>
    <category term="basque" />
    <category term="BBQ" />
    <category term="cooking" />
    <category term="eating" />
    <category term="personal" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>A good number of my friends know my love of the Basque tradition of communal meals.  I was first introduced to <a href="http://saschameinrath.com/2006mar22what_is_basque">Basque in Urbana, Illinois</a> and immediately became a core member and instigator.  While <a href="http://saschameinrath.com/2006aug13liquid_nitrogen_ice_cream_and_the_age_old_question_daddy_how_did_we_used_to_light_charcoal_before_we_got_liquid_oxygen">Basque is about fun and camaraderie and food -- there's usually a good bit of experimentation as well (though rarely with liquid oxygen and nitrogen</a>.  </p>
<p>When I moved to the East Coast, I worried that I might be leaving behind the notion of fantastic foods and epicurean gatherings.  Boy was I wrong.  Dinner conversation gave way to small gatherings, which ended up with further pondering, and last month, to the continuation of the tradition.</p>
<p>Here's menus &amp; commentary from the past two Basques:</p>
<p><a href="http://saschameinrath.com/node/599">Read more...</a></p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>A good number of my friends know my love of the Basque tradition of communal meals.  I was first introduced to <a href="http://saschameinrath.com/2006mar22what_is_basque">Basque in Urbana, Illinois</a> and immediately became a core member and instigator.  While <a href="http://saschameinrath.com/2006aug13liquid_nitrogen_ice_cream_and_the_age_old_question_daddy_how_did_we_used_to_light_charcoal_before_we_got_liquid_oxygen">Basque is about fun and camaraderie and food -- there's usually a good bit of experimentation as well (though rarely with liquid oxygen and nitrogen</a>.  </p>
<p>When I moved to the East Coast, I worried that I might be leaving behind the notion of fantastic foods and epicurean gatherings.  Boy was I wrong.  Dinner conversation gave way to small gatherings, which ended up with further pondering, and last month, to the continuation of the tradition.</p>
<p>Here's menus &amp; commentary from the past two Basques:</p>
<p><a href="http://saschameinrath.com/node/599">Read more...</a></p>
<p><!--break--></p>
<ul>
<p>The first Greenbelt Basque was held second weekend in March and was quite the auspicious beginning to Basque -- East Coast edition!  We had straightline winds of 65MPH, freak hail, and tons of fantastic food. Here's the run-down:</p>
<p>Appetizers:<br />
Jalapeño-Stuffed Olives (&amp; Other Varieties)<br />
Tamari Almonds<br />
Port Salut, Aged Gouda, Extra Sharp Cheddar<br />
Fresh-Baked Brioche<br />
Fresh-baked Baguettes<br />
Various Crackers &amp; Melba Toasts</p>
<p>Entres:<br />
Carmelized Onion &amp; Blue Cheese Torte<br />
Roasted Red Pepper Torte<br />
Salmon -- Pacific Northwest Style (smokey &amp; tangy)<br />
Grilled Jumbo Scallops with Fresh Corn Salsa<br />
2.5lb (Thick-Cut) T-Bone Steak<br />
Andouille Sausage (from the Dutch Market)<br />
Butternut Squash and Cinnamon Cream Soup<br />
Garlic Beef Tangine<br />
Vegetarian Tangine<br />
Saffron &amp; Almond Couscous<br />
Savory Parsnip, Asparagus, Tofu, &amp; Cheddar Pot Pie<br />
Home-made Gravlax</p>
<p>Deserts:<br />
Basil Sorbet<br />
Pavlova with Kiwis and Raspberries<br />
Profiteroles w/ melted hazelnut chocolate<br />
Various Dark Chocolates<br />
Home-Roasted Coffee</p>
<p>Potables:<br />
Myriad Microbrews (e.g., Saranac, Wild Goose, Magic Hat, Flying Dog, Boddingtons, Fat Angel, Otter Creek Spring Ale, Pilsner Urquell)<br />
Courtney Benham 2005 Cabernet Sauvignon<br />
Buffalo Grove 2005 Syrah<br />
Gumdale 2006 Shiraz<br />
Gumdale Reserve 2006 Shiraz<br />
Rodenbach -- Flemish Sour Beer<br />
Victory Golden Monkey Tripel<br />
Tia Maria &amp; Cream<br />
Tomintoul 16-Year Single Malt Scotch</p>
<p><hr></p>
<p>April 2008 Basque</p>
<p>The weather was fantastic and people were feeling in the Basque spirit!  While some participants may have been expecting a mere dozen dishes going in, what they got was something far, FAR grander.</p>
<p>We ate out in the garden this past weekend on what could only be described as a near-on perfect day (had to make an emergency Ikea run for the necessary table &amp; seating).  For those tracking such things, over the course of 8 hours we ate 20+ courses and drank nearly a case of beer, 8 bottles of wine, a good nip of honey-pepper vodka, and, yes, a bottle of Tequila!  Folks certainly pulled out all the stops -- it was a pescatarian aquavorian feast of daunting (waste-line enhancing, oh-so-delicious) proportions... for those who weren't here (or may have passed out between courses 18-21), here's the run-down:</p>
<p>Appetizers:<br />
Homemade Guacamole &amp; Blue Corn Chips<br />
Mixed Nuts<br />
Toasted Almonds<br />
Olives stuffed with Provolone</p>
<p>Entres:<br />
Grilled Salmon Mark II w/ Dill &amp; Mustard<br />
Grilled Portabellos w/ Saba &amp; Boysenberry Preserves<br />
Grilled Asparagus w/ Olive Oil, Lemon, &amp; Sea Salt<br />
Grilled Skewers of Marinated Tuna<br />
Stuffed Baked Red &amp; Yellow Peppers<br />
Baby Back Ribs, Northwest Style<br />
Garlic &amp; Chile Asian-Style Grilled Shrimp Skewers<br />
Caribbean Mustard-Rum Grilled Shrimp Skewers<br />
Haddock Fillets Marinated in Tequila-Lime-Chile Sauce<br />
Savory Flan (with your choice of green pea or roasted pepper sauces)<br />
Savory Bready Comestible a.k.a., Paul's Baked Gruyere Bread<br />
Mole Poblano<br />
"Vegetarian Corn Dish That Can be an Alternative Substrate for the Mole"<br />
Tortillas (nice-Salvadoran-lady-at-the-Laurel-market-made)</p>
<p>Deserts:<br />
Sweet Flan w/ Caramel<br />
Sweet Bread a.k.a., Paul's Un-Crossed (yet slightly peevish) Rum-Current Buns<br />
Apple Torte<br />
Coconut Cake<br />
Fruit Salad w/ Watermelon, Apple, Pineapple, &amp; Cantaloupe</p>
<p>Potables:<br />
Sweet Tea<br />
Lemonade<br />
Yuengling Lager<br />
McHenry's Ale<br />
Cusquena Beer<br />
Newcastle Ale<br />
Wolavers Brown Ale<br />
Imperial Cerveja<br />
1800 Cuervo Silver<br />
Nemeroff Honey-Pepper Vodka<br />
San Giorgio 2006 Pinot Grigio<br />
Penfolds Koonunga Hill 2006 Chiraz Cabernet<br />
Barefoot Zinfandel<br />
Little Boomey 2006 Shiraz<br />
Meridian 2004 Cabernet Sauvignon<br />
Valdadige Montresor 2005 Pinot Grigio<br />
Fish Eye 2005 Cabernet Sauvignon </p>
</ul>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Asheville, N.C. endorses new Wi-Fi business model</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/apr/14/asheville_n_c_endorses_new_wi_fi_business_model" />
    <id>http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/apr/14/asheville_n_c_endorses_new_wi_fi_business_model</id>
    <published>2008-04-14T11:32:28-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-04-14T11:32:28-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sascha</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Asheville" />
    <category term="community wireless" />
    <category term="MAIN" />
    <category term="municipal wireless" />
    <category term="NAF" />
    <category term="public private partnership" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I've been talking with folks down in North Carolina about innovative business models that will facilitate public private partnerships whereby municipalities work with non-profit organizations to deliver broadband services.  As the Philly model continues to flail about (though I'm hopeful for some resolution in the near future on this), alternative systems are being implemented.  Wally Bowen over at the<a href="http://main.nc.us" target="blank">Mountain Area Information Network (MAIN)</a> has been heading up the charge.  A month or so ago I wrote to the Asheville City Council supporting the plan that MAIN was proposing.  And I'm quite happy to see such a resounding endorsement for what is certain to become a remarkably interesting municipal wireless project.</p>
<p>Here's more:</p>
<ul>
Asheville, N.C. endorses new Wi-Fi business model</p>
<p>ASHEVILLE, N.C. -- A proposal to make Asheville a "Wi-Fi City" -- via city-wide, wireless Internet access -- won unanimous endorsement March 25 from the Asheville City Council.</p>
<p>The plan, put forth by the nonprofit Mountain Area Information Network (MAIN), would provide secure wireless coverage -- including mobile access -- throughout the city.</p>
<p>"I'm pleased that the City of Asheville has officially endorsed MAIN's 'Wi-Fi City' proposal" said Asheville Mayor Terry Bellamy. "This effort will not only help bridge the Digital Divide in our community. It also signals to the nation that Asheville has a 21st-century vision for an inclusive and sustainable Digital Economy. . . ."</p>
<p>Read the entire story:  <a href="http://www.main.nc.us/wifi" target="blank">http://www.main.nc.us/wifi</a>.</p>
</ul>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I've been talking with folks down in North Carolina about innovative business models that will facilitate public private partnerships whereby municipalities work with non-profit organizations to deliver broadband services.  As the Philly model continues to flail about (though I'm hopeful for some resolution in the near future on this), alternative systems are being implemented.  Wally Bowen over at the<a href="http://main.nc.us" target="blank">Mountain Area Information Network (MAIN)</a> has been heading up the charge.  A month or so ago I wrote to the Asheville City Council supporting the plan that MAIN was proposing.  And I'm quite happy to see such a resounding endorsement for what is certain to become a remarkably interesting municipal wireless project.</p>
<p>Here's more:</p>
<ul>
Asheville, N.C. endorses new Wi-Fi business model</p>
<p>ASHEVILLE, N.C. -- A proposal to make Asheville a "Wi-Fi City" -- via city-wide, wireless Internet access -- won unanimous endorsement March 25 from the Asheville City Council.</p>
<p>The plan, put forth by the nonprofit Mountain Area Information Network (MAIN), would provide secure wireless coverage -- including mobile access -- throughout the city.</p>
<p>"I'm pleased that the City of Asheville has officially endorsed MAIN's 'Wi-Fi City' proposal" said Asheville Mayor Terry Bellamy. "This effort will not only help bridge the Digital Divide in our community. It also signals to the nation that Asheville has a 21st-century vision for an inclusive and sustainable Digital Economy. . . ."</p>
<p>Read the entire story:  <a href="http://www.main.nc.us/wifi" target="blank">http://www.main.nc.us/wifi</a>.</p>
</ul>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New York Times &amp; Wall Street Journal Agree -- The US Needs Wireless Broadband Innovation.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/apr/02/new_york_times_wall_street_journal_agree_us_needs_wireless_broadband_innovation" />
    <id>http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/apr/02/new_york_times_wall_street_journal_agree_us_needs_wireless_broadband_innovation</id>
    <published>2008-04-02T11:39:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-04-02T11:46:39-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sascha</name>
    </author>
    <category term="broadband" />
    <category term="NAF" />
    <category term="New York Times" />
    <category term="Wall Street Journal" />
    <category term="WSDs" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It's rare that the New York Times and Wall Street Journal agree so wholeheartedly on things, but this past week has seen both issue calls for wireless innovation across the United States.  <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/29/opinion/29sat4.html?_r=2&amp;oref=slogin&amp;ref=opinion&amp;pagewanted=print" target="blank">The New York Times issued a pro-municipal wireless editorial</a> that, among other things, states:</p>
<ul>Broadband service is no longer a luxury. It has become a basic part of the infrastructure of education and democracy. EarthLink should fulfill the commitments it made. Even in these tough economic times, cities should keep pushing municipal Wi-Fi and looking for partners and plans that can make it a reality.</ul>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB120709194778881739-lMyQjAxMDI4MDA3MjAwOTIxWj.html" target="blank">Lee Gomes from the Wall Street Journal issued a pro-White Space Device column</a> that focuses on the successes and potential uses of these new technologies:</p>
<ul>The white-space proposal has been in the news in recent weeks because of its strong backing by Microsoft and Google, among others. White space, they say, could help create a "Wi-Fi on steroids," with faster connection speeds running over longer distances than are possible now in the hot spots common in homes and coffee shops.  As for interference with TV broadcasts -- or with wireless microphones, which use this same spectrum -- that can be easily handled. Before transmitting any data, a white-space networking device would "listen" to detect if a frequency is in use. A version of this "smart sensing" is already widely and successfully deployed by the U.S. military.
</ul>
<p>Here are the full stories:</p>
<p><a href="http://saschameinrath.com/node/597">Read more...</a></p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It's rare that the New York Times and Wall Street Journal agree so wholeheartedly on things, but this past week has seen both issue calls for wireless innovation across the United States.  <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/29/opinion/29sat4.html?_r=2&amp;oref=slogin&amp;ref=opinion&amp;pagewanted=print" target="blank">The New York Times issued a pro-municipal wireless editorial</a> that, among other things, states:</p>
<ul>Broadband service is no longer a luxury. It has become a basic part of the infrastructure of education and democracy. EarthLink should fulfill the commitments it made. Even in these tough economic times, cities should keep pushing municipal Wi-Fi and looking for partners and plans that can make it a reality.</ul>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB120709194778881739-lMyQjAxMDI4MDA3MjAwOTIxWj.html" target="blank">Lee Gomes from the Wall Street Journal issued a pro-White Space Device column</a> that focuses on the successes and potential uses of these new technologies:</p>
<ul>The white-space proposal has been in the news in recent weeks because of its strong backing by Microsoft and Google, among others. White space, they say, could help create a "Wi-Fi on steroids," with faster connection speeds running over longer distances than are possible now in the hot spots common in homes and coffee shops.  As for interference with TV broadcasts -- or with wireless microphones, which use this same spectrum -- that can be easily handled. Before transmitting any data, a white-space networking device would "listen" to detect if a frequency is in use. A version of this "smart sensing" is already widely and successfully deployed by the U.S. military.
</ul>
<p>Here are the full stories:</p>
<p><a href="http://saschameinrath.com/node/597">Read more...</a></p>
<p><!--break--></p>
<p>From the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/29/opinion/29sat4.html?_r=2&amp;oref=slogin&amp;ref=opinion&amp;pagewanted=print" target="blank">New York Times</a>:</p>
<ul>
March 29, 2008<br />
Editorial<br />
Broadening Broadband</p>
<p>The big problem in providing Internet service to rural America is often called “the last mile” — the difficulty in reaching the smallest communities and farthest-flung houses and farms. In cities, that problem might be called “the last block” — the difficulty in reaching every neighborhood, no matter how poor.</p>
<p>For a while, many American cities, caught up in a tide of technological and fiscal optimism, promised to try to make Internet coverage available to all by making it citywide, wireless and low-cost or even free.</p>
<p>That has proved to be harder than it seemed at first. EarthLink, an Internet provider that was partnering with Philadelphia, has pulled out of a much-heralded project there, and other service providers are rethinking similar projects.</p>
<p>EarthLink is calling it a change in strategic direction. What that phrase means, simply, is where’s the profit? It is a reasonable question. But for the people who have been left without Internet service as municipal wireless plans have collapsed, there are no reasonable answers, only an all-too-familiar barrier between them and the information age.</p>
<p>The neighborhoods that most need low-cost, public wireless service now find themselves largely dependent on Internet access through public libraries. This may not sound like a terrible thing, but have you seen what’s happened to the budgets — and the operating hours — of public libraries?</p>
<p>To cities and Internet providers, municipal Wi-Fi looked like an ideal partnership. Philadelphia gave EarthLink free access to utility poles for mounting wireless routers. EarthLink promised to build hot spots, offer low-cost residential service and provide still lower-cost access for the poorest customers.</p>
<p>The costs of building a network turned out to be higher than expected — at a time when prices for private Internet service were dropping. It also hurt, in Philadelphia’s case, that there was a major change at EarthLink, which went from being an advocate of municipal Wi-Fi to a company determined to cut costs.</p>
<p>Broadband service is no longer a luxury. It has become a basic part of the infrastructure of education and democracy. EarthLink should fulfill the commitments it made. Even in these tough economic times, cities should keep pushing municipal Wi-Fi and looking for partners and plans that can make it a reality.
</ul>
<p><hr></p>
<p>From the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article_email/article_print/SB120709194778881739-lMyQjAxMDI4MDA3MjAwOTIxWj.html" target="blank">Wall Street Journal</a>:</p>
<ul>
PORTALS<br />
By LEE GOMES 	</p>
<p>If Granny Were Real She'd Like the Idea Of 'Wi-Fi on Steroids'<br />
April 2, 2008; Page B1</p>
<p>Granny is a lovable gray-haired lady in a pink sweater who likes nothing better than to sit quietly at home watching her favorite TV shows. It's one of her few remaining joys in life. Why, then, are those billionaire moguls in the high-tech industry trying to take it away?</p>
<p>Granny isn't real: She recently was featured in a TV ad airing in the Washington area. But the scare tactics are. Both are concoctions of the nation's broadcasting lobby, which is currently doing all it can to stop one of the best ideas a federal agency has had in a long time.</p>
<p>The brainstorm belongs to the Federal Communications Commission, which is looking into whether a new generation of wireless computing devices could make use of the empty "white space" spectrum associated with television broadcasts. For technical reasons, not all broadcast TV frequencies are in use in any one geographic area -- think of how some of the channels on your TV are empty.</p>
<p>Spectrum-policy groups have long regarded this white space as a wasted national resource, one that if properly tapped could help close the appalling bandwidth gap, both wired and wireless, between the U.S. and the rest of the developed world. The FCC is testing whether Wi-Fi can run in these white spaces without interfering with normal television broadcasts, even though most Americans get their TV from cable and satellite; a determination is expected later this year.</p>
<p>The white-space proposal has been in the news in recent weeks because of its strong backing by Microsoft and Google, among others. White space, they say, could help create a "Wi-Fi on steroids," with faster connection speeds running over longer distances than are possible now in the hot spots common in homes and coffee shops.</p>
<p>As for interference with TV broadcasts -- or with wireless microphones, which use this same spectrum -- that can be easily handled. Before transmitting any data, a white-space networking device would "listen" to detect if a frequency is in use. A version of this "smart sensing" is already widely and successfully deployed by the U.S. military.</p>
<p>Broadcasters, however, insist that smart sensing just doesn't work. The National Association of Broadcasters and its allies warned in an interview that we shouldn't play "interference roulette" that would "disenfranchise" Americans dependent on broadcast television, "the bulwark that has tied the nation together from an information standpoint."</p>
<p>As evidence of the technical failure of smart sensing, the broadcast lobby points to the occasional failures in the white-space prototypes being tested by the FCC -- the most recent of which occurred just last week. But the tech companies that supplied those prototypes, including Microsoft, Philips and Motorola, say they are early-testing devices whose occasional hiccups indicate nothing about the basic soundness of the smart-sensing/white-space idea.</p>
<p>Rather than just allow the technicians at the FCC to make a calm technical assessment of what should be a dry matter of spectrum physics, the broadcasters are lobbying, with newspaper and TV ads, to inflame emotions.</p>
<p>Enter Granny. In her commercial, she became a bit crotchety when the picture on her screen started to break up because of interference from "unlicensed devices." Intones the announcer, "If high-tech companies like Microsoft get their way, your picture could freeze and become unwatchable."</p>
<p>While the broadcasting lobby is one of Washington's strongest, this battle might be a tough one even for them. For one thing, they need to convince politicians and regulators that the global technology industry, home to all the tech miracles of the past few decades, is fundamentally incapable of a designing a relatively simple bit of hardware.</p>
<p>BlackBerrys, iPhones and the like easily handle spectrum tasks that are every bit as complicated as anything a white-space device would need to do. An industry that can put the Library of Congress in something the size of a fingernail ought to be able to figure it out.</p>
<p>So why, then, are broadcasters so opposed to the idea? Maybe out of habit, or maybe because they want to use the white space for Wi-Fi themselves one day. Sascha Meinrath, a spectrum activist with the New America Foundation policy group in Washington, has another theory: That with smarter use of the spectrum, entirely new forms of broadcasting will become possible that will threaten the monopoly enjoyed by the broadcasters who happen to own spectrum today.</p>
<p>Perhaps as a way of fighting back, white-space activists should take a clue from the broadcasters, and create their own Granny. This Granny would still be able to watch all her favorite broadcast TV shows, because properly using white space won't interfere with them. But she'd also be able to use her new white-space Wi-Fi data network to talk with her grandchildren over two-way, high-definition video. Or to check in with her doctor without leaving home. Or to spend the afternoon reminiscing with girlfriends in other cities.</p>
<p>She can't do a lot of that now, in part because U.S. broadcasters are hogging huge swaths of bandwidth that they don't really need. I wonder what Granny would say were she to find that out; you know how crotchety old people can be.</p>
<p>Write to Lee Gomes at lee.gomes@wsj.com</p>
</ul>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Diminishing ISPs, ITU and OECD Ranking -- Could There Possibly be a Relationship. </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/mar/31/diminishing_isps_itu_and_oecd_ranking_could_there_possibly_be_relationship" />
    <id>http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/mar/31/diminishing_isps_itu_and_oecd_ranking_could_there_possibly_be_relationship</id>
    <published>2008-03-31T15:00:44-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-03-31T15:04:45-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sascha</name>
    </author>
    <category term="broadband" />
    <category term="broadband penetration" />
    <category term="census" />
    <category term="competition" />
    <category term="ITU" />
    <category term="NAF" />
    <category term="OECD" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I was recently looking at data over the course of a week from the US Census, the ITU, and the OECD, all looking at indicators of broadband services in the United States.  What grabbed my attention was the remarkably close relationship between the diminishing number of Internet Service Providers and the global standing of the United States when it comes to broadband penetration rates.  Clearly there's a relationship here, the question is, what's driving this mess?  Here's the data in graphical format (sources are the US Census, ITU, and OECD):</p>
<p><img src="http://saschameinrath.com/files/ISPs ITU and OECD Rankings (2001-2005)_0.png" width="100%"></p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I was recently looking at data over the course of a week from the US Census, the ITU, and the OECD, all looking at indicators of broadband services in the United States.  What grabbed my attention was the remarkably close relationship between the diminishing number of Internet Service Providers and the global standing of the United States when it comes to broadband penetration rates.  Clearly there's a relationship here, the question is, what's driving this mess?  Here's the data in graphical format (sources are the US Census, ITU, and OECD):</p>
<p><img src="http://saschameinrath.com/files/ISPs ITU and OECD Rankings (2001-2005)_0.png" width="100%"></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Boston, MA Goes Live with First Pilot Project.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/mar/31/boston_ma_goes_live_first_pilot_project" />
    <id>http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/mar/31/boston_ma_goes_live_first_pilot_project</id>
    <published>2008-03-31T11:04:11-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-03-31T11:05:04-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sascha</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Boston" />
    <category term="municipal wireless" />
    <category term="NAF" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Alicia Mickelsen sent me Belair's press release on the Boston pilot wireless deployment.  For everyone that's been wondering, "What's Boston been up to?" Here's the answer:</p>
<ul>
Today, Boston announces the completion of the city’s first wireless pilot.  Equipment from BelAir Networks, the leading provider of mobile broadband mesh networks, is powering the next generation wireless broadband network in the Roxbury and Dorchester neighborhoods of Boston.  The network is the result of the company’s partnership with openairboston.net, a private, non-profit corporation created to develop, implement and operate a network to provide wireless internet access throughout the City of Boston.</p>
<p>Since its soft-launch in late August, openairboston.net estimates that the network has already had over 3,000 unique users, with average session length of 79 minutes per user. The network now makes it possible for approximately 8,000 households within the pilot area access to the Internet for as little as $9.95 a month.</p>
<p>I have included the press releases on the network below, from BelAir Networks and from the city of Boston.  If you would like to learn more about the network, I would be happy to put you in touch with a BelAir Networks executive.</p>
<p>Thank you,</p>
<p>Alicia</p>
<p>Alicia Mickelsen<br />
Breakaway Communications for BelAir Networks<br />
156 Fifth Avenue, Suite 410, New York, NY 10010<br />
(212) 616-6002 | amick@breakawaycom.com
</ul>
<p><a href="http://saschameinrath.com/node/595">Read more...</a></p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Alicia Mickelsen sent me Belair's press release on the Boston pilot wireless deployment.  For everyone that's been wondering, "What's Boston been up to?" Here's the answer:</p>
<ul>
Today, Boston announces the completion of the city’s first wireless pilot.  Equipment from BelAir Networks, the leading provider of mobile broadband mesh networks, is powering the next generation wireless broadband network in the Roxbury and Dorchester neighborhoods of Boston.  The network is the result of the company’s partnership with openairboston.net, a private, non-profit corporation created to develop, implement and operate a network to provide wireless internet access throughout the City of Boston.</p>
<p>Since its soft-launch in late August, openairboston.net estimates that the network has already had over 3,000 unique users, with average session length of 79 minutes per user. The network now makes it possible for approximately 8,000 households within the pilot area access to the Internet for as little as $9.95 a month.</p>
<p>I have included the press releases on the network below, from BelAir Networks and from the city of Boston.  If you would like to learn more about the network, I would be happy to put you in touch with a BelAir Networks executive.</p>
<p>Thank you,</p>
<p>Alicia</p>
<p>Alicia Mickelsen<br />
Breakaway Communications for BelAir Networks<br />
156 Fifth Avenue, Suite 410, New York, NY 10010<br />
(212) 616-6002 | amick@breakawaycom.com
</ul>
<p><a href="http://saschameinrath.com/node/595">Read more...</a></p>
<p><!--break--></p>
<ul>
<p>OpenAirBoston.net Wireless Network Goes Live With BelAir Networks</p>
<p>BelAir Networks industry-leading wireless mesh nodes power high-speed Wi-Fi network in Roxbury and Dorchester</p>
<p>Kanata, Ontario — March 31, 2008 — BelAir Networks, the leading provider of mobile broadband mesh networks, today announced that its equipment is powering a next generation wireless broadband network in the Roxbury and Dorchester neighborhoods of Boston, Massachusetts.  The network is the result of the company’s partnership with openairboston.net, a private, non-profit corporation created to develop, implement and operate a network to provide wireless internet access throughout the City of Boston.</p>
<p>The Grove Hall/Dudley Square Wireless Pilot Network is formally launching today in a ‘Wire Cutting’ ceremony hosted by Mayor Thomas Menino at 10:45 a.m. at the Lilla G. Frederick Pilot Middle School, 270 Columbia Road, Dorchester, MA.</p>
<p>“We are pleased to work with BelAir Networks on this important project,” stated Mayor Thomas Menino.  “BelAir’s proven track record delivering carrier-class wireless networks supporting a variety of public safety, public works and public access applications in leading cities around the world make them the ideal partner for our openairboston.net initiative.”</p>
<p>BelAir Networks is the leading provider of mobile broadband mesh network solutions with more than 400 deployments worldwide in leading cities such as Minneapolis, London and Toronto, high-profile venues such as Lincoln Center in New York, and Dolphin Stadium in Miami and in mission-critical Defense applications including the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, Charleston.  BelAir Networks high performance products offer the industry’s highest capacity, lowest latency and fastest roaming speeds.</p>
<p>“We are committed to providing our city with best-in-class wireless access and BelAir Networks has been instrumental in helping us deliver on our commitment to create a truly innovative wireless ecosystem for the citizens of Boston,” said Pam Reeve, CEO, openairboston.net.</p>
<p>BelAir Networks entered 2008 as the worldwide Wi-Fi mesh market leader according to Dell’Oro Group’s recently released Q4 2007 Wireless LAN quarterly report</p>
<p>The company’s market share achievements and consistent growth reflect the widespread adoption of its comprehensive mesh networking product portfolio in public safety networks, municipal networks, port and mass transit installations, hotel and venue networks, defense applications, and plant deployments around the world.</p>
<p>”We are proud to support this innovative project that is bringing next generation wireless broadband to the city of Boston,” stated Bernard Herscovich, President and CEO, BelAir Networks.  "BelAir Networks delivers the industry's highest performance and most reliable mobile broadband mesh networks to leading cities worldwide and we are pleased to join with openairboston.net in this important effort.”</p>
<p>About openairboston.net</p>
<p>openairboston.net (OAB) is a private, non-profit corporation created to develop, implement and operate a network to provide affordable wireless internet access throughout the City of Boston. This is an exciting opportunity for Boston to take the lead in one of the most important developments the next twenty years, in which people, companies and communities will become both more connected and less tethered, as wireless technologies evolve. For more information, please visit http://www.openairboston.net</p>
<p>About BelAir Networks</p>
<p>BelAir Networks is the first company to offer scalable, mobile wireless broadband mesh networking solutions with the highest quality for data, voice and video. The company teams with world-class global partners to deploy proven, cost-effective wireless broadband mesh networks. BelAir’s wireless networking solutions are built on the only multi-service architecture for Wi-Fi, WiMAX, 4.9 GHz, 5.9 GHz and 4.4 GHz spectrum bands. BelAir Networks patented solution deploys quickly, blending into the physical infrastructure of downtown business districts, hotels and resorts, campuses, transportation systems and ports. Founded in 2001, BelAir Networks is a privately held company.  For more information about BelAir products and customers, visit www.belairnetworks.com.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<p><b>Mayor, openairboston.net Announce Completion of Boston’s First Wireless Pilot</b></p>
<p>Menino Heralds Non-Profit, Partners, and Community in Making Grove Hall/Dudley Square Network A Reality</p>
<p>Mayor Thomas M. Menino today joined openairboston.net CEO Pam Reeve at a ‘wire-cutting’ ceremony in celebration of the City’s first wireless pilot network in Roxbury and Dorchester’s Grove Hall and Dudley Square neighborhoods. The ceremony marked a major step forward in Boston’s wireless initiative, which in now delivering high-speed service to one of Boston’s most underserved neighborhoods.</p>
<p>Since its soft-launch in late August, openairboston.net estimates that the network has already had over 3,000 unique users, with average session length of 79 minutes per user. The network now makes it possible for approximately 8,000 households within the pilot area access to the Internet for as little as $9.95 a month.</p>
<p>“Today, we are celebrating a significant milestone in bringing the power of the Internet to a community which may not have enjoyed access in the past,” said Mayor Menino. “We are thrilled to deliver on this commitment at no cost to the taxpayers, and we hope folks will take advantage of low-cost Internet access that is now available to them.”</p>
<p>Originally announced in October of 2006, the pilot has been overseen by former telecommunications executive, Pam Reeve, as CEO of openairboston.net, who has worked in collaboration with a team of City officials. Although the build-out was complete at the end of last summer, Menino said the City waited until now to announce the network to ensure signal strength and reliability for many users. The wireless pilot network is made up of 64 wireless radios installed atop buildings, light poles, and traffic signals, creating what is known as a wireless mesh network.</p>
<p>The pilot, which covers approximately a single square-mile of Boston, was enabled by hundreds of thousands of dollars of in-kind donations and equipment from four major contributing technology partners. Galaxy Internet Services is the Internet Service Provider (ISP), BelAir Networks provided the pilot’s radios, metroNEXT provided the backhaul for the network, and AboveNet provided the wireless network’s connection to the World Wide Web.</p>
<p>"Galaxy Internet Services is glad to participate in this WiFi launch. Even while testing the network in this relatively small neighborhood, we have already logged thousands of unique users,” said Sandy Bendremer and Bob Carp of Galaxy Internet Services. “We are very encouraged about the potential for WiFi access for every corner of Boston.”</p>
<p>Bernard Herscovich, President and CEO of BelAir Networks, added, “We are proud to support this innovative project that is bringing next generation wireless broadband to the city of Boston. BelAir Networks delivers the industry's highest performance and most reliable mobile broadband mesh networks to leading cities worldwide and we are pleased to join with openairboston.net in this important effort.”</p>
<p>“MetroNEXT and its partners have delivered fiber-speed network capacity to Boston’s first pilot network that not only supports Internet access – but also enables many new business and consumer services,” said Tom Wetmore, CEO and founder of metroNEXT. “The possibilities include voice over Internet phone calls, security &amp; environmental monitoring, video, and distance learning – all without the huge expense of laying fiber-optic cable.”</p>
<p>In addition, Reeve said, the pilot would not have been possible without the monetary donations of the Boston Foundation and Partners Healthcare, and pointed out that several community organizations have worked closely with openairboston.net to develop marketing strategies for the pilot’s unveiling.</p>
<p>“This initiative has benefited from the collaboration of some of Boston’s brightest technology and business minds, wireless technology partners, and many other contributors – all of whom have shown incredible commitment to the project,” said Reeve. “The pilot has taken us longer than anyone would have hoped. But we’ve learned every step of the way, and I believe Boston’s Wireless Initiative is now in an even better position to succeed given all this project has taught us.”</p>
<p>Today’s announcement marks a major achievement for Boston’s Wireless Initiative, which comes at a time when many other cities across the country have abandoned their plans for municipal wireless entirely. The initiative was first launched in response to recommendations made by the Wireless Task Force to build a low-cost network designed to offer inexpensive access to broadband, which then ISPs could utilize to deliver service to residents. Menino asked Reeve to carry the initiative forward as interim CEO; 8 months later she filed incorporation papers for the non-profit, openairboston.net.  </p>
<p>Since then, Menino said, the non-profit has begun designing the organization’s framework, executed contracts with the City and outside vendors, and completed work on the Grove Hall and Dudley Square pilot. Reeve said she now estimates the cost of a city-wide build-out to be significantly less than the $16-20 million originally cited in the Task Force report; estimates are now somewhere around $10-$12 million. openairboston.net is currently working with the City to identify neighborhoods for additional pilot networks.</p>
</ul>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>When it Comes to White Space Devices, Microsoft Does What it Does Best...  Sucks!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/mar/27/when_it_comes_white_space_devices_microsoft_does_what_it_does_best_sucks" />
    <id>http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/mar/27/when_it_comes_white_space_devices_microsoft_does_what_it_does_best_sucks</id>
    <published>2008-03-27T19:22:35-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-03-27T19:22:35-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sascha</name>
    </author>
    <category term="FCC" />
    <category term="microsoft" />
    <category term="NAF" />
    <category term="testing" />
    <category term="WSDs" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I'm sure that the NAB will soon be releasing a flurry of PR decrying the failure of a white space device during FCC testing.  Which device, you may ask?  Why, the Microsoft one, of course.  And which device failed miserably during the first round of FCC testing?  Why, the Microsoft one, of course.  But didn't a white space device suffer a power failure last month -- which one was that?  Why, the Microsoft one, of course.  </p>
<p>So what's the National Association of Broadcasters going to go to town on -- declaring that the technology simply won't work based on the failure of a single company's device?  Why, yes, you guessed it...</p>
<p>So why is the National Association of Broadcasters spending so much time and energy filling the press with the continuing failure of Microsoft's device?  Probably because they're scared as hell that someone might otherwise point out that the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARPA_XG" target="blank">DARPA XG Project</a> has already proofed out the viability of white space device technology. </p>
<p><img src="http://www.cognitiveradio.wireless.vt.edu/dokuwiki/lib/exe/fetch.php?cache=cache&amp;media=research:spectrum_figure2-darpa_xg.jpg" width="100%"></p>
<p>"Hold on a second," you might ask, "white space device technology has already been proofed out and deployed by the military?!?"  Indeed!  In fact, <a href="http://www.sharedspectrum.com/inc/content/press/XG_Demo_News_Release_060918.pdf" target="blank">on September 18, 2006 Shared Spectrum publicly announced the successful testing of DARPA XG technology for battlefield warfare</a>.  Assuming for a second that physics works the same for both military and consumer products, if white space device technology works for battlefield warfare, I'm of the opinion that it's going to work in my living room as well.  In fact, <a href="http://www.ieee-dyspan.org/2007/Demonstrations.html" target="blank">DARPA XG technology was successfully tested in civilian situations at DYSPAN in Ireland on April 16-20, 2007</a>.  </p>
<p>So why is this even an issue?  Because physics, reality, precedent, and data are coming up against a monstrously large PR and FUD campaign by one of the most powerful lobbies in Washington, DC -- the National Association of Broadcasters.   Which begs the question, who sucks even more than Microsoft?  </p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I'm sure that the NAB will soon be releasing a flurry of PR decrying the failure of a white space device during FCC testing.  Which device, you may ask?  Why, the Microsoft one, of course.  And which device failed miserably during the first round of FCC testing?  Why, the Microsoft one, of course.  But didn't a white space device suffer a power failure last month -- which one was that?  Why, the Microsoft one, of course.  </p>
<p>So what's the National Association of Broadcasters going to go to town on -- declaring that the technology simply won't work based on the failure of a single company's device?  Why, yes, you guessed it...</p>
<p>So why is the National Association of Broadcasters spending so much time and energy filling the press with the continuing failure of Microsoft's device?  Probably because they're scared as hell that someone might otherwise point out that the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARPA_XG" target="blank">DARPA XG Project</a> has already proofed out the viability of white space device technology. </p>
<p><img src="http://www.cognitiveradio.wireless.vt.edu/dokuwiki/lib/exe/fetch.php?cache=cache&amp;media=research:spectrum_figure2-darpa_xg.jpg" width="100%"></p>
<p>"Hold on a second," you might ask, "white space device technology has already been proofed out and deployed by the military?!?"  Indeed!  In fact, <a href="http://www.sharedspectrum.com/inc/content/press/XG_Demo_News_Release_060918.pdf" target="blank">on September 18, 2006 Shared Spectrum publicly announced the successful testing of DARPA XG technology for battlefield warfare</a>.  Assuming for a second that physics works the same for both military and consumer products, if white space device technology works for battlefield warfare, I'm of the opinion that it's going to work in my living room as well.  In fact, <a href="http://www.ieee-dyspan.org/2007/Demonstrations.html" target="blank">DARPA XG technology was successfully tested in civilian situations at DYSPAN in Ireland on April 16-20, 2007</a>.  </p>
<p>So why is this even an issue?  Because physics, reality, precedent, and data are coming up against a monstrously large PR and FUD campaign by one of the most powerful lobbies in Washington, DC -- the National Association of Broadcasters.   Which begs the question, who sucks even more than Microsoft?  </p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Update on Bell Canada Degrading Traffic of Independent ISPs.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/mar/27/update_bell_canada_degrading_traffic_independent_isps" />
    <id>http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/mar/27/update_bell_canada_degrading_traffic_independent_isps</id>
    <published>2008-03-27T12:07:38-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-03-27T12:07:38-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sascha</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Bell Canada" />
    <category term="broadband" />
    <category term="NAF" />
    <category term="network neutrality" />
    <category term="predatory pricing" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>As I reported earlier, <a href="http://saschameinrath.com/2008/mar/26/bell_canada_degrading_traffic_independent_isps" target="blank">Bell Canada has been caught throttling traffic from independent service providers</a>.  More data is now coming in and the extent of the bandwidth throttling has been remarkable.  Here's a 24hr snapshot from one ISP:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.dslreports.com/r0/download/1289999~9f6b07adff86c09bab21eaf8fd445826/Throttling.png" width="100%"></p>
<p>Meanwhile, independent ISPs have set up a map of where they're being discriminated against -- as it turns out, Bell Canada has been doing this to scores and scores of competitors. Here's the map:</p>
<p><iframe width="425" height="350" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" src="http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?hl=en&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;oe=UTF8&amp;msa=0&amp;msid=104821912887968331755.0004491be77e932825a73&amp;ll=45.147212,-77.790027&amp;spn=5.656005,13.14806&amp;output=embed&amp;s=AARTsJr9QyJUZuzbrgxXp3GvodBMe3RKzg"></iframe><br /><small><a href="http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?hl=en&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;oe=UTF8&amp;msa=0&amp;msid=104821912887968331755.0004491be77e932825a73&amp;ll=45.147212,-77.790027&amp;spn=5.656005,13.14806&amp;source=embed" style="color:#0000FF;text-align:left">View Larger Map</a></small></p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>As I reported earlier, <a href="http://saschameinrath.com/2008/mar/26/bell_canada_degrading_traffic_independent_isps" target="blank">Bell Canada has been caught throttling traffic from independent service providers</a>.  More data is now coming in and the extent of the bandwidth throttling has been remarkable.  Here's a 24hr snapshot from one ISP:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.dslreports.com/r0/download/1289999~9f6b07adff86c09bab21eaf8fd445826/Throttling.png" width="100%"></p>
<p>Meanwhile, independent ISPs have set up a map of where they're being discriminated against -- as it turns out, Bell Canada has been doing this to scores and scores of competitors. Here's the map:</p>
<p><iframe width="425" height="350" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" src="http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?hl=en&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;oe=UTF8&amp;msa=0&amp;msid=104821912887968331755.0004491be77e932825a73&amp;ll=45.147212,-77.790027&amp;spn=5.656005,13.14806&amp;output=embed&amp;s=AARTsJr9QyJUZuzbrgxXp3GvodBMe3RKzg"></iframe><br /><small><a href="http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?hl=en&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;oe=UTF8&amp;msa=0&amp;msid=104821912887968331755.0004491be77e932825a73&amp;ll=45.147212,-77.790027&amp;spn=5.656005,13.14806&amp;source=embed" style="color:#0000FF;text-align:left">View Larger Map</a></small></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Coming Data Obfuscation Arms Race.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/mar/27/coming_data_obfuscation_arms_race" />
    <id>http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/mar/27/coming_data_obfuscation_arms_race</id>
    <published>2008-03-27T11:48:32-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-03-27T11:49:05-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sascha</name>
    </author>
    <category term="broadband" />
    <category term="Commissioner McDowell" />
    <category term="end-to-end networking" />
    <category term="FCC" />
    <category term="NAF" />
    <category term="network neutrality" />
    <category term="policy" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>FCC Commissioner McDowell presented at the <a href="http://www.techpolicysummit.org" target="blank">Tech Policy Summit</a> pointing to the recently announced Comcast/Bittorrent "solution" whereby Comcast would stop degrading Bittorrent traffic as a huge success.  Personally, I think the so-called solution does nothing to protect end-users from future malfeasance by network operators, so I asked Commissioner McDowell what the FCC is doing to prevent what will certainly become a data obfuscation arms race from developing.  Here's the problem in a few easy-to-understand steps:</p>
<ul>
<p>1. A network operator discriminates against certain types of traffic.</p>
<p>2. End users begin to encrypt their traffic and pass data from applications and/or services that are discriminated against through an encrypted tunnel (e.g., <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vpn" target="blank">VPN</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ssh" target="blank">SSH</a>, etc.).</p>
<p>3. The network operator is now forced into a fairly problematic decision -- if they don't discriminate against encrypted traffic, more and more services and applications will encrypt their traffic; but if they do discriminate against encrypted traffic, they're saying, in essence, that if you want privacy, you will get worse service.  </p>
<p>4. Meanwhile, corporations that rely upon VPN for their everyday dealings, will scream bloody murder; so then network operators are forced into an even more dastardly decision -- discriminate wholesale against <i>classes</i> of users.  In other words, all residential-class users will be foisted off into a low-priority tier of service.
</ul>
<p>So how can this be avoided?  </p>
<p><b>Build capacity.</b></p>
<p>A great resource discussing the rationality of this solution is <a href="http://www.dtc.umn.edu/~odlyzko/doc/metering-expensive-rs.pdf" target="blank">David Levinson and Andrew Odlyzko's, "Too expensive to meter: The influence of transaction costs in transportation and communication"</a>.  But the main issue is that building capacity is the best solution for end users, while the tiering and further commodification of existing bandwidth comes at the literal expense of end users.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>FCC Commissioner McDowell presented at the <a href="http://www.techpolicysummit.org" target="blank">Tech Policy Summit</a> pointing to the recently announced Comcast/Bittorrent "solution" whereby Comcast would stop degrading Bittorrent traffic as a huge success.  Personally, I think the so-called solution does nothing to protect end-users from future malfeasance by network operators, so I asked Commissioner McDowell what the FCC is doing to prevent what will certainly become a data obfuscation arms race from developing.  Here's the problem in a few easy-to-understand steps:</p>
<ul>
<p>1. A network operator discriminates against certain types of traffic.</p>
<p>2. End users begin to encrypt their traffic and pass data from applications and/or services that are discriminated against through an encrypted tunnel (e.g., <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vpn" target="blank">VPN</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ssh" target="blank">SSH</a>, etc.).</p>
<p>3. The network operator is now forced into a fairly problematic decision -- if they don't discriminate against encrypted traffic, more and more services and applications will encrypt their traffic; but if they do discriminate against encrypted traffic, they're saying, in essence, that if you want privacy, you will get worse service.  </p>
<p>4. Meanwhile, corporations that rely upon VPN for their everyday dealings, will scream bloody murder; so then network operators are forced into an even more dastardly decision -- discriminate wholesale against <i>classes</i> of users.  In other words, all residential-class users will be foisted off into a low-priority tier of service.
</ul>
<p>So how can this be avoided?  </p>
<p><b>Build capacity.</b></p>
<p>A great resource discussing the rationality of this solution is <a href="http://www.dtc.umn.edu/~odlyzko/doc/metering-expensive-rs.pdf" target="blank">David Levinson and Andrew Odlyzko's, "Too expensive to meter: The influence of transaction costs in transportation and communication"</a>.  But the main issue is that building capacity is the best solution for end users, while the tiering and further commodification of existing bandwidth comes at the literal expense of end users.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Tech Policy Summit and the Future of Wide-Area Public Broadband.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/mar/26/tech_policy_summit_and_future_wide_area_public_broadband" />
    <id>http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/mar/26/tech_policy_summit_and_future_wide_area_public_broadband</id>
    <published>2008-03-26T20:22:13-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-03-27T11:26:08-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sascha</name>
    </author>
    <category term="NAF" />
    <category term="presentation" />
    <category term="saschameinrath" />
    <category term="tech policy summit" />
    <category term="wireless" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I'm here in California at the <a href="http://www.techpolicysummit.org" target="blank">Tech Policy Summit</a> and just presented on a panel, "The Future of Wide-Area Public Broadband."  The panel's been covered by Capitol Valley Media <a href="http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/03/the-future-of-widearea-public.html" target="blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>Here's a picture from Andrew (I'm the first seated fellow on the left):</p>
<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2036/2364456881_c16557901c.jpg?v=0"></p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I'm here in California at the <a href="http://www.techpolicysummit.org" target="blank">Tech Policy Summit</a> and just presented on a panel, "The Future of Wide-Area Public Broadband."  The panel's been covered by Capitol Valley Media <a href="http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/03/the-future-of-widearea-public.html" target="blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>Here's a picture from Andrew (I'm the first seated fellow on the left):</p>
<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2036/2364456881_c16557901c.jpg?v=0"></p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What&#039;s Google Doing with White Spaces?  A Quick Synopsis of their Recent FCC Filing.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/mar/26/whats_google_doing_white_spaces_quick_synopsis_their_recent_fcc_filing" />
    <id>http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/mar/26/whats_google_doing_white_spaces_quick_synopsis_their_recent_fcc_filing</id>
    <published>2008-03-26T20:14:22-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-03-27T11:26:48-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sascha</name>
    </author>
    <category term="beaconing" />
    <category term="FCC" />
    <category term="google" />
    <category term="NAF" />
    <category term="policy" />
    <category term="telecommunications" />
    <category term="WSDs" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>A lot of folks have been asking me for my take on the recent Google ex parte filing at the FCC.  </p>
<p>Google put in its ex parte on Friday, March 21, 2008.  The final draft of the document does reflect some of the input that the New America Foundation provided, but still offers proposals that are particularly discouraging for ad-hoc (decentralized networking).  </p>
<p>Here's a brief synopsis:</p>
<p>1. Google (and 30+ other major corporations) are developing an open stack mobile system (a.k.a., the Android phone) as a part of the Open Handset Alliance and want to use the white space as a medium for these new technologies.</p>
<p>2. Google is offering, "to provide, at no cost to third parties, the technical support necessary to make these plans happen; this could include intellectual property and reference designs for underlying technologies, open geo-databases maintained by Google, and other supporting infrastructure."</p>
<p>3. Google is backing Motorola's plan for "a combination of geo-location (to protect broadcast TV) and beacons (to protect wireless microphones)."</p>
<p>4. Google is proposing a safe harbor on channels 36-38 for wireless microphones.</p>
<p>5. Google states that "the combination of geo-location, beacons, and 'safe harbors' is more than sufficient to ensure the protection of all licensed uses."</p>
<p>6. Google reiterates that the technology has already been proofed out in the Darpa XG project and that DARPA XG systems are now in use by the military (the field deployment was new information): "widely used 802.11a-based WiFi currently supports spectrum sensing to protect military radar from interference. Moreover, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) neXt Generation (XG) program has graduated from lab experiments to field use of the technology. Both examples represent an important existence proof for the viability of spectrum sensing, where the risks of failure inarguably are far greater than those potentially posed to broadcast TV and wireless microphones."</p>
<p>7. Google asks for the creation of a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to explore the geolocational/beacon solution.</p>
<p>You can <a href="http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&amp;id_document=6519868157" target="blank">read the March 21, 2008 Google ex parte here</a>.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>A lot of folks have been asking me for my take on the recent Google ex parte filing at the FCC.  </p>
<p>Google put in its ex parte on Friday, March 21, 2008.  The final draft of the document does reflect some of the input that the New America Foundation provided, but still offers proposals that are particularly discouraging for ad-hoc (decentralized networking).  </p>
<p>Here's a brief synopsis:</p>
<p>1. Google (and 30+ other major corporations) are developing an open stack mobile system (a.k.a., the Android phone) as a part of the Open Handset Alliance and want to use the white space as a medium for these new technologies.</p>
<p>2. Google is offering, "to provide, at no cost to third parties, the technical support necessary to make these plans happen; this could include intellectual property and reference designs for underlying technologies, open geo-databases maintained by Google, and other supporting infrastructure."</p>
<p>3. Google is backing Motorola's plan for "a combination of geo-location (to protect broadcast TV) and beacons (to protect wireless microphones)."</p>
<p>4. Google is proposing a safe harbor on channels 36-38 for wireless microphones.</p>
<p>5. Google states that "the combination of geo-location, beacons, and 'safe harbors' is more than sufficient to ensure the protection of all licensed uses."</p>
<p>6. Google reiterates that the technology has already been proofed out in the Darpa XG project and that DARPA XG systems are now in use by the military (the field deployment was new information): "widely used 802.11a-based WiFi currently supports spectrum sensing to protect military radar from interference. Moreover, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) neXt Generation (XG) program has graduated from lab experiments to field use of the technology. Both examples represent an important existence proof for the viability of spectrum sensing, where the risks of failure inarguably are far greater than those potentially posed to broadcast TV and wireless microphones."</p>
<p>7. Google asks for the creation of a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to explore the geolocational/beacon solution.</p>
<p>You can <a href="http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&amp;id_document=6519868157" target="blank">read the March 21, 2008 Google ex parte here</a>.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bell Canada Degrading Traffic of Independent ISPs.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/mar/26/bell_canada_degrading_traffic_independent_isps" />
    <id>http://www.saschameinrath.com/2008/mar/26/bell_canada_degrading_traffic_independent_isps</id>
    <published>2008-03-26T16:47:52-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-03-27T11:25:31-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sascha</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Bell Canada" />
    <category term="broadband" />
    <category term="NAF" />
    <category term="network neutrality" />
    <category term="predatory pricing" />
    <category term="Steven Mansour" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://stevenmansour.com/en/links/2008/march/26/bell_canada_throttling_other_dsl_reseller_traffic" target="blank">Steven Mansour just pinged me about Bell Canada purposefully degrading traffic of independent internet service providers</a>.  This is a huge violation of network neutrality and exactly the kind of behavior by telco incumbents that <i>must</i> be made illegal. <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/2782/1" target="blank">Michael Geist looks to have broken the story</a> -- I'm sure it'll be coming out to the more mainstream media momentarily.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://stevenmansour.com/en/links/2008/march/26/bell_canada_throttling_other_dsl_reseller_traffic" target="blank">Steven Mansour just pinged me about Bell Canada purposefully degrading traffic of independent internet service providers</a>.  This is a huge violation of network neutrality and exactly the kind of behavior by telco incumbents that <i>must</i> be made illegal. <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/2782/1" target="blank">Michael Geist looks to have broken the story</a> -- I'm sure it'll be coming out to the more mainstream media momentarily.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
